Write down, if possible, the largest natural number.
Answer
643.8k+ views
Hint: We will first understand the set of Natural Numbers and which elements does it consist of. After that, we will assume that it has some largest element and then prove by contradiction that it is
not possible.
Complete step-by-step answer:
We know that the set of Natural Numbers is given by {1, 2, 3, 4, ……………….. }.
We can clearly observe that 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < ……….
\[\therefore \] 1 is the least element.
But, we need the greatest of Natural Numbers.
Let us assume that it has a largest number which is say a.
Now, since a is the largest among all the Natural Numbers.
\[\therefore n < a,\forall n \in \mathbb{N}\] ……………..(1)
Now, we know that the successor of a natural number is also a natural number.
\[\therefore \] a + 1 is also a natural number.
So, by using (1), we will get:
$ \Rightarrow a + 1 < a$
This implies that:
$ \Rightarrow 1 < 0$, which is absolutely absurd.
Therefore, our assumption is wrong.
Hence, the set of Natural numbers do not have any largest number.
Note: The students must note that “This property of Natural Numbers that it does not have any maximum is known as the “Archimedean Property” which is going to be extremely handy to you in future. Archimedean property states that “the set of Natural Numbers are unbounded above”. But the students must also note that the set of Natural Numbers have the “Well Ordering Property” which states that it always has a least element. Like in natural numbers 1 is the least element.
The students must note that we used the fact: successor of natural numbers is also a natural number. But we could also have used the fact that “The set of Natural Numbers are closed under addition”.
not possible.
Complete step-by-step answer:
We know that the set of Natural Numbers is given by {1, 2, 3, 4, ……………….. }.
We can clearly observe that 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < ……….
\[\therefore \] 1 is the least element.
But, we need the greatest of Natural Numbers.
Let us assume that it has a largest number which is say a.
Now, since a is the largest among all the Natural Numbers.
\[\therefore n < a,\forall n \in \mathbb{N}\] ……………..(1)
Now, we know that the successor of a natural number is also a natural number.
\[\therefore \] a + 1 is also a natural number.
So, by using (1), we will get:
$ \Rightarrow a + 1 < a$
This implies that:
$ \Rightarrow 1 < 0$, which is absolutely absurd.
Therefore, our assumption is wrong.
Hence, the set of Natural numbers do not have any largest number.
Note: The students must note that “This property of Natural Numbers that it does not have any maximum is known as the “Archimedean Property” which is going to be extremely handy to you in future. Archimedean property states that “the set of Natural Numbers are unbounded above”. But the students must also note that the set of Natural Numbers have the “Well Ordering Property” which states that it always has a least element. Like in natural numbers 1 is the least element.
The students must note that we used the fact: successor of natural numbers is also a natural number. But we could also have used the fact that “The set of Natural Numbers are closed under addition”.
Recently Updated Pages
You are the head boyhead girl Write a notice informing class 7 english CBSE

The image formed by a plane mirror is always laterally class 7 physics CBSE

When phenolphthalein is added toNaOH the colour of class 7 chemistry CBSE

Find the least number which when divided by 15 leaves class 7 maths CBSE

Show that one and only one out of n n + 2n or n + -class-7-maths-CBSE

During heavy exercise we get cramps in the legs due class 7 biology CBSE

Trending doubts
Full Form of IASDMIPSIFSIRSPOLICE class 7 social science CBSE

List of coprime numbers from 1 to 100 class 7 maths CBSE

The plural of Chief is Chieves A True B False class 7 english CBSE

Differentiate between weather and climate How do they class 7 social science CBSE

What is BLO What is the full form of BLO class 8 social science CBSE

Explain the Treaty of Vienna of 1815 class 10 social science CBSE


