In a Fraunhofer diffraction experiment at a single slit using a light of wavelength 400nm, the first minimum is formed at an angle of \[{30^ \circ }\]. The direction $\theta $ of the first secondary maximum is given by:
a. ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{2}{3}} \right)$
b. ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right)$
c. ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{1}{4}} \right)$
d. $ta{n^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{2}{3}} \right)$
Answer
654k+ views
Hint: From the path difference relation for minima try to find the slit width. Use that to find the direction for secondary maximum.
Formula Used:
For minima of a diffraction:
$a\sin {\theta _{\min }} = n\lambda $ -----(1)
Where,
a is width of the slit,
n is order of the minima,
${\theta _{\min }}$ is angle for ${n^{th}}$ minima formation,
$\lambda $ is the wavelength of the light.
For maxima of a diffraction:
$a\sin {\theta _{\max }} = \left( {n + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right)\lambda $ ------(2)
${\theta _{\max }}$ is angle for ${n^{th}}$maxima formation.
Complete answer:
Given:
Wavelength of the light used, $\lambda = 400nm$.
For n=1 i.e. for first minima ${\theta _{\min }} = {30^ \circ }$.
To find: direction angle for first secondary maxima.
> Step 1
Substitute the value of n, $\lambda $and ${\theta _{\min }}$in eq(1) to get a:
$
asin\left( {{{30}^ \circ }} \right) = 1 \times 400 \\
\Rightarrow a \times \dfrac{1}{2} = 400 \\
\Rightarrow a = 400 \times 2 = 800nm \\
$
> Step 2
For first secondary maxima, $n = 1$.
Now, use the value of a in eq(2) to get ${\theta _{\max }}$:
$
800 \times sin{\theta _{\max }} = \left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right) \times 400 \\
\Rightarrow sin{\theta _{\max }} = \dfrac{3}{2} \times \dfrac{{400}}{{800}} \\
\Rightarrow {\theta _{\max }} = {\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right) \\
$
Hence, the direction $\theta $ of the first secondary maximum is given by ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right)$.
Note: This problem can be solved without using the value of $\lambda$ and without finding the value of a. Just take the ratio of eq(1) and eq(2) after inserting proper values of n and ${\theta _{\min }}$. You’ll see:
$
\dfrac{{a\sin {\theta _{\max }}}}{{a\sin ({{30}^ \circ })}} = \dfrac{{\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right)\lambda }}{{1 \times \lambda }} \\
\Rightarrow \sin {\theta _{\max }} = \dfrac{3}{2} \times \dfrac{1}{2} \\
\Rightarrow {\theta _{\max }} = {\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right) \\
$
And this is the same answer you got previously but this time with a lot less amount of calculations.
Also, many students get confused with the term ‘first secondary maxima’. Always remember that the first secondary maxima is the first maxima beside the central one, not the central one itself. So, for this maxima the value of n will be 1 not 0.
Formula Used:
For minima of a diffraction:
$a\sin {\theta _{\min }} = n\lambda $ -----(1)
Where,
a is width of the slit,
n is order of the minima,
${\theta _{\min }}$ is angle for ${n^{th}}$ minima formation,
$\lambda $ is the wavelength of the light.
For maxima of a diffraction:
$a\sin {\theta _{\max }} = \left( {n + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right)\lambda $ ------(2)
${\theta _{\max }}$ is angle for ${n^{th}}$maxima formation.
Complete answer:
Given:
Wavelength of the light used, $\lambda = 400nm$.
For n=1 i.e. for first minima ${\theta _{\min }} = {30^ \circ }$.
To find: direction angle for first secondary maxima.
> Step 1
Substitute the value of n, $\lambda $and ${\theta _{\min }}$in eq(1) to get a:
$
asin\left( {{{30}^ \circ }} \right) = 1 \times 400 \\
\Rightarrow a \times \dfrac{1}{2} = 400 \\
\Rightarrow a = 400 \times 2 = 800nm \\
$
> Step 2
For first secondary maxima, $n = 1$.
Now, use the value of a in eq(2) to get ${\theta _{\max }}$:
$
800 \times sin{\theta _{\max }} = \left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right) \times 400 \\
\Rightarrow sin{\theta _{\max }} = \dfrac{3}{2} \times \dfrac{{400}}{{800}} \\
\Rightarrow {\theta _{\max }} = {\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right) \\
$
Hence, the direction $\theta $ of the first secondary maximum is given by ${\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right)$.
Note: This problem can be solved without using the value of $\lambda$ and without finding the value of a. Just take the ratio of eq(1) and eq(2) after inserting proper values of n and ${\theta _{\min }}$. You’ll see:
$
\dfrac{{a\sin {\theta _{\max }}}}{{a\sin ({{30}^ \circ })}} = \dfrac{{\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{2}} \right)\lambda }}{{1 \times \lambda }} \\
\Rightarrow \sin {\theta _{\max }} = \dfrac{3}{2} \times \dfrac{1}{2} \\
\Rightarrow {\theta _{\max }} = {\sin ^{ - 1}}\left( {\dfrac{3}{4}} \right) \\
$
And this is the same answer you got previously but this time with a lot less amount of calculations.
Also, many students get confused with the term ‘first secondary maxima’. Always remember that the first secondary maxima is the first maxima beside the central one, not the central one itself. So, for this maxima the value of n will be 1 not 0.
Recently Updated Pages
Which of the following graphs shows the variation of class 12 physics CBSE

Draw a labelled diagram of the human male reproductive class 12 biology CBSE

Describe the experiment to compare the emf of two cells class 12 physics CBSE

What is standard hydrogen electrode

What is conventional current and electric current class 12 physics CBSE

2Bromopentane is treated with an alcoholic KOH solution class 12 chemistry CBSE

Trending doubts
A member of Simon commission later became Prime Minister class 12 social science CBSE

Give one example of a reptile that is viviparous class 12 biology CBSE

Which is the correct genotypic ratio of mendel dihybrid class 12 biology CBSE

Differentiate between homogeneous and heterogeneous class 12 chemistry CBSE

What is the Full Form of PVC, PET, HDPE, LDPE, PP and PS ?

Suicide bags of cells are aEndoplasmic reticulum bLysosome class 12 biology CBSE

