If [.] denotes the greatest integer function, then find the value of $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + .......... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}$ is,
Answer
298.8k+ views
Hint: In this particular question use the concept that [x] is greater than or less than equal to x, so [x] is written as, $x - 1 < \left[ x \right] \leqslant x$, and later on use the concept of sandwich theorem, so use these concepts to reach the solution of the question.
Complete step-by-step answer:
Given data
[.] denotes the greatest integer function.
So according to the definition of the greatest integer function we have,
$ \Rightarrow x - 1 < \left[ x \right] \leqslant x$................ (1)
Similarly,
$ \Rightarrow 2x - 1 < \left[ {2x} \right] \leqslant 2x$
$ \Rightarrow 3x - 1 < \left[ {3x} \right] \leqslant 3x$
.
.
.
$ \Rightarrow nx - 1 < \left[ {nx} \right] \leqslant nx$
Now add all these equation we have,
$ \Rightarrow \left( {x + 2x + 3x + .... + nx} \right) - \left( {1 + 1 + 1 + ...... + 1} \right) < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant \left( {x + 2x + 3x + .....nx} \right)$
Now as we know that 1 + 1 + 1 +...... + 1 up to n terms is equal to n so we have,
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {1 + 2 + 3 + .... + n} \right) - n < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant x\left( {1 + 2 + 3 + .....n} \right)$
Now as we know that 1 + 2 + 3 +...... + n is the summation of first n terms whose sum is given as, $\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}} \right) - n < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}$
Now divide by ${n^2}$ throughout we have,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{{x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}} \right) - n}}{{{n^2}}} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{{x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}}}{{{n^2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{{2{n^2}}}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{{2{n^2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right)$
Now apply $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } $in all of the terms we have,
$ \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right)} \right)$
Now as we know that when, $n \to \infty \Rightarrow \dfrac{1}{n} \to 0$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{x}{2} < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{x}{2}$
Now according to sandwich theorem if, $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right)$ and $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right) = P$ then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) = P$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) = \dfrac{x}{2}$
So this is the required answer.
Note: Whenever we face such types of questions the key concept we have to remember is that always recall the sum of first n terms and always recall the sandwich theorem that if $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right)$, and $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right) = P$ then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) = P$
Complete step-by-step answer:
Given data
[.] denotes the greatest integer function.
So according to the definition of the greatest integer function we have,
$ \Rightarrow x - 1 < \left[ x \right] \leqslant x$................ (1)
Similarly,
$ \Rightarrow 2x - 1 < \left[ {2x} \right] \leqslant 2x$
$ \Rightarrow 3x - 1 < \left[ {3x} \right] \leqslant 3x$
.
.
.
$ \Rightarrow nx - 1 < \left[ {nx} \right] \leqslant nx$
Now add all these equation we have,
$ \Rightarrow \left( {x + 2x + 3x + .... + nx} \right) - \left( {1 + 1 + 1 + ...... + 1} \right) < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant \left( {x + 2x + 3x + .....nx} \right)$
Now as we know that 1 + 1 + 1 +...... + 1 up to n terms is equal to n so we have,
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {1 + 2 + 3 + .... + n} \right) - n < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant x\left( {1 + 2 + 3 + .....n} \right)$
Now as we know that 1 + 2 + 3 +...... + n is the summation of first n terms whose sum is given as, $\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}} \right) - n < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}$
Now divide by ${n^2}$ throughout we have,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{{x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}} \right) - n}}{{{n^2}}} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{{x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}}}{{{n^2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{{2{n^2}}}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{{2{n^2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right)$
Now apply $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } $in all of the terms we have,
$ \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right)} \right)$
Now as we know that when, $n \to \infty \Rightarrow \dfrac{1}{n} \to 0$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{x}{2} < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{x}{2}$
Now according to sandwich theorem if, $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right)$ and $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right) = P$ then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) = P$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) = \dfrac{x}{2}$
So this is the required answer.
Note: Whenever we face such types of questions the key concept we have to remember is that always recall the sum of first n terms and always recall the sandwich theorem that if $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right)$, and $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right) = P$ then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) = P$
Recently Updated Pages
Letfx be a polynomial with positive degree satisfy-class-12-maths-JEE_Main

Evaluate the definite integral given as intlimits13left class 12 maths JEE_Main

The sum of squares of two parts of a number 100 is-class-12-maths-JEE_Main

Geometry of Complex Numbers Explained

JEE Main 2023 (February 1st Shift 2) Physics Question Paper with Answer Key

JEE Main 2023 (February 1st Shift 1) Maths Question Paper with Answer Key

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2026: Exam Dates, Session 2 Updates, City Slip, Admit Card & Latest News

Understanding the Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Ring

Understanding Atomic Structure for Beginners

Electron Gain Enthalpy and Electron Affinity Explained

Derivation of Equation of Trajectory Explained for Students

How to Convert a Galvanometer into an Ammeter or Voltmeter

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Percentile vs Marks 2026: JEE Main Cutoff, AIR & IIT Admission Guide

What Are Current and Potential Difference in Electricity?

Hybridisation in Chemistry – Concept, Types & Applications

Understanding Geostationary and Geosynchronous Satellites

Isoelectronic Species: Definition, Examples & Importance

Understanding the Angle of Deviation in a Prism

